Posted on 11 October 2016
Improving environmental performance at European coal power stations could save 20,000 lives every year
Effective emissions limits could save thousands of lives every year, yet more than half of coal power stations in Europe are operating with ‘permission to pollute’ above limits set in EU law. These are the findings of a new report ‘Lifting Europe’s Dark Cloud: How cutting coal saves lives’ published today by the European Environmental Bureau (EEB), the Health and Environment Alliance (HEAL), Climate Action Network (CAN) Europe, WWF and Sandbag.
‘Lifting Europe’s Dark Cloud’ shows how improving environmental performance at European coal power stations could save 20,000 lives every year. By setting and enforcing pollution limits in line with the best industry-recognised, tried-and-tested techniques, the annual number of premature deaths caused by burning coal could be reduced from 22,900 to 2,600 deaths
The report also finds that current legislation is failing to deliver its intended health benefits because special exceptions have been granted that allow for emissions over the agreed ‘safety net’ levels. At the time of publication, more than half of the coal power plants in Europe have ‘permission to pollute’ beyond the limits set in the Industrial Emissions Directive
Before the end of the year, the EU and Member States will have the opportunity to adopt improved environmental performance standards, the ‘revised LCP BREF’. By agreeing these standards and implementing effective limits on coal pollution, real progress can be made in improving the health of people across Europe. The revision process has already been delayed for more than two years, leading to 5,600 unnecessary deaths and a total health bill of more than 15.6 billion euros.
“The best available techniques we call for in this report are all tried-and-tested and were already being demonstrated under technically and economically viable conditions decades ago. The EU considers itself a world leader on environmental issues but when it comes to coal, decision makers have their heads stuck in a dark cloud!”, says Christian Schaible, Policy Manager on industrial production from the European Environmental Bureau (EEB)
Medical professionals have expressed support for the report; “Air pollution kills,” says Professor Bert Brunekreef of the European Respiratory Society
. "Experts in lung health want to see immediate remedial action. Inaction cannot be justified when it is human health and lives that are at stake."
As there are no techniques which completely eliminate emissions from burning coal and with coal power plants responsible for 18 per cent of all of Europe’s greenhouse gases, truly lifting Europe’s Dark Cloud will require the complete phase-out of coal power in favour of sustainable renewable energy sources and reduced energy consumption
GENERAL ASSESSMENT FOR BULGARIA:
The Bulgarian authorities have not been active in the information exchange. The limited interventions from the Bulgarian representatives were always aimed at defending the polluters. Bulgaria argued in favour of the desulphurization rate for lignite to allow a tripling of SOx emissions.
GENERAL ASSESSMENT FOR ROMANIA:
The Romanian authorities have not been active in the information exchange. The limited interventions from the Romanian representatives were however in favour of the desulphurization rate for lignite to allow a tripling of SOx emissions. On the positive side, Romania - similar to UK – was against including the co-incineration of waste other than biomass in LCPs due to environmental and health risks. While the intentions of this proposal were positive, this could have led to a regulatory gap (e.g. LCPs in the chemical industry would have been excluded from the LCP BREF standards).
GENERAL ASSESSMENT FOR HUNGARY:
The Hungarian authorities have not been active in the information exchange, therefore no assessment can be made.
For further information:
Philippa Jones, European Environmental Bureau, email@example.com
, +32 2 790 88 18/ +32 4 71 57 01 81
Audrey Gueudet, WWF, firstname.lastname@example.org
, +32 2 743 88 06
Julia Gogolewska, Health and Environment Alliance (HEAL), email@example.com
, +49 176 30765177
Kathrin Heeren, firstname.lastname@example.org
, +32 2893 0827
Notes to the editor:
Quotes from the other authors:
Darek Urbaniak, Energy Policy Officer at WWF European Policy Office
"The EU does not need to reinvent the wheel. Legislation that can help improve the health of EU citizens affected by coal power is ready and waiting. It is now up to EU leaders to demonstrate political courage and take responsibility for adopting and implementing it swiftly.
Julia Gogolewska, Health and Environment Alliance (HEAL)
“The health damage resulting from coal fumes today is neither necessary nor inevitable because the means to reduce this pollution already exist. The new regulation will finally require polluters to bear some of the costs that are currently forced on society in the form of illness, health services and lifetime lost
Joanna Flisowska, Coal Policy Coordinator at CAN Europe
“The health of European citizens cannot afford any further delay in enforcing new pollution standards (BREFs). While the EU's ultimate goal should be to commit to the complete phase out of coal and to a transformation pathway to renewable energy and reduced energy consumption, the EU still needs to limit pollution from coal power plants with its deadly and costly impacts on people, health and the environment.